1953 Jeep CJ vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Colorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Jeep CJ | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | CJ | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
