1953 Jeep CJ vs. 2011 Tata Sumo
To start off, 2011 Tata Sumo is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Tata Sumo (67 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Tata Sumo should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Tata Sumo weights approximately 764 kg more than 1953 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Sumo. (119 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1953 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Sumo.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jeep CJ | 2011 Tata Sumo | |
Make | Jeep | Tata |
Model | CJ | Sumo |
Year Released | 1953 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 119 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2410 mm |