1953 Jeep CJ vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Audi A6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Jeep CJ | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Jeep | Audi |
| Model | CJ | A6 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4915 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2911 mm |
