1953 Jeep CJ vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jeep CJ | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | CJ | Epica |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |