1953 Jeep CJ vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Juke (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Juke weights approximately 325 kg more than 1953 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Juke (240 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Juke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jeep CJ | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | CJ | Juke |
Year Released | 1953 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1441 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2530 mm |