1953 Maserati A6G vs. 2004 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6G (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Maserati A6G weights approximately 280 kg more than 2004 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Maserati A6G | 2004 MCC Smart | |
Make | Maserati | MCC |
Model | A6G | Smart |
Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1954 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 820 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2370 mm |