1953 Maserati A6G vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1953 Maserati A6G. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1953 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 105 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Maserati A6G | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Maserati | Honda |
| Model | A6G | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1954 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1205 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2436 mm |
