1953 Maserati A6GCM vs. 1966 Maserati Mistral
To start off, 1966 Maserati Mistral is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Maserati Mistral (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 695 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Maserati A6GCM | 1966 Maserati Mistral | |
Make | Maserati | Maserati |
Model | A6GCM | Mistral |
Year Released | 1953 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1959 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 1265 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2410 mm |