1953 Maserati A6GCM vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCM (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (98 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCM should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 625 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma has automatic transmission and 1953 Maserati A6GCM has manual transmission. 1953 Maserati A6GCM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Maserati A6GCM | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Maserati | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A6GCM | Sigma |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1959 cc | 2554 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 98 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 1195 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2520 mm |
