1953 Maserati A6GCM vs. 1980 Volvo 164
To start off, 1980 Volvo 164 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCM (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCM should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 164.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Maserati A6GCM | 1980 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6GCM | 164 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1959 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3350 mm |
