1953 Maserati A6GCM vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 1,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6GCM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCM (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCM should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner weights approximately 645 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM.
Because 1953 Maserati A6GCM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Maserati A6GCM | 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| Make | Maserati | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A6GCM | Space Runner |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1959 cc | 1833 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 1215 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2530 mm |
