1953 Maserati A6GCM vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW Z3 weights approximately 830 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 BMW Z3 has automatic transmission and 1953 Maserati A6GCM has manual transmission. 1953 Maserati A6GCM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 BMW Z3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Maserati A6GCM | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
| Make | Maserati | BMW |
| Model | A6GCM | Z3 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1959 cc | 2996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 1400 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2450 mm |
