1953 Maserati A6GCM vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 1,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6GCM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCM (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCM should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru R2 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM.
Because 1953 Maserati A6GCM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Maserati A6GCM | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Maserati | Subaru |
| Model | A6GCM | R2 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1959 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 780 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2370 mm |
