1953 Maserati A6GCM vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK

To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 6,208 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (877 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 683 more horse power than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1188 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 1953 Maserati A6GCM has manual transmission. 1953 Maserati A6GCM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: