1953 Maserati A6GCM vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. (194 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1953 Maserati A6GCM.
Because 1953 Maserati A6GCM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Maserati A6GCM | 2012 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Maserati | Audi |
| Model | A6GCM | A3 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1959 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
