1953 Maserati A6GCM vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCM (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCM should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 730 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM.
Because 1953 Maserati A6GCM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Maserati A6GCM | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | A6GCM | 3 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1959 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 1300 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2639 mm |