1953 Maserati A6GCS vs. 1978 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1978 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCS (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCS should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda RX-3 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Maserati A6GCS | 1978 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Maserati | Mazda |
| Model | A6GCS | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1963 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 850 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2320 mm |
