1953 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2002 Mazda 6

To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1953 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1953 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 845 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1953 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1953 Maserati A6GCS has manual transmission. 1953 Maserati A6GCS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: