1953 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1953 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1953 Maserati A6GCS.
Because 1953 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1953 Maserati A6GCS has manual transmission. 1953 Maserati A6GCS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Maserati A6GCS | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | A6GCS | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2880 mm |