1953 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCS (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCS should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Clio weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCS.
Because 1953 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Maserati A6GCS | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Maserati | Renault |
Model | A6GCS | Clio |
Year Released | 1953 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1640 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2580 mm |