1953 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCS (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Cube. (122 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCS should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Cube. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Cube weights approximately 721 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCS.
Because 1953 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Maserati A6GCS | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Maserati | Nissan |
Model | A6GCS | Cube |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1301 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2530 mm |