1953 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1953 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1953 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 990 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1953 Maserati A6GCS has manual transmission. 1953 Maserati A6GCS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: