1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1963 Ford Zodiac is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 1963 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | 300 | Zodiac |
Year Released | 1953 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2780 mm |