1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2005 Volvo V50
To start off, 2005 Volvo V50 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2005 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | 300 | V50 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2870 mm |