1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
Model | 300 | 6 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2789 mm |