1953 Morris Six vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Morris Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Morris Six would be higher. At 2,215 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Morris Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Zo (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1953 Morris Six. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Zo should accelerate faster than 1953 Morris Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 355 kg more than 1953 Morris Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Morris Six. (133 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Morris Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Morris Six | 1999 Renault Zo | |
| Make | Morris | Renault |
| Model | Six | Zo |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2215 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1575 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 83 L |
