1953 Packard Patrician vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Packard Patrician is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Packard Patrician is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Packard Patrician. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Packard Patrician | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Packard | Nissan |
Model | Patrician | Rogue |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2690 mm |