1953 Porsche 356 vs. 2010 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2010 Seat Exeo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Seat Exeo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Seat Exeo weights approximately 600 kg more than 1953 Porsche 356.
Because 1953 Porsche 356 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Porsche 356. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Porsche 356 | 2010 Seat Exeo | |
Make | Porsche | Seat |
Model | 356 | Exeo |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1285 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1772 mm |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2642 mm |