1953 Renault Juva vs. 2006 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 790 kg more than 1953 Renault Juva.
Because 1953 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 1953 Renault Juva has manual transmission. 1953 Renault Juva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Renault Juva | 2006 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Renault | Chevrolet |
Model | Juva | Epica |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2710 mm |