1953 Renault Juva vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Renault Juva would be higher. At 2,399 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 559 kg more than 1953 Renault Juva.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Renault Juva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Renault Juva | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Juva | XC90 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 1001 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1369 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2860 mm |