1953 Renault Juva vs. 2010 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2010 Nissan Micra is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Micra weights approximately 697 kg more than 1953 Renault Juva.
Because 1953 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Renault Juva | 2010 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Renault | Nissan |
Model | Juva | Micra |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 87 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2440 mm |