1953 Renault Juva vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Renault Juva would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1953 Renault Juva. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1953 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1108 kg more than 1953 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Renault Juva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Renault Juva | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | Juva | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1003 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1918 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4627 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1891 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1713 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2774 mm |
