1953 Riley RM A vs. 1983 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 1983 Suzuki Alto is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Riley RM A weights approximately 625 kg more than 1983 Suzuki Alto.
Because 1953 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Suzuki Alto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Riley RM A | 1983 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Riley | Suzuki |
Model | RM A | Alto |
Year Released | 1953 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 39 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2160 mm |