1953 Riley RM A vs. 1994 ZAZ Slavuta
To start off, 1994 ZAZ Slavuta is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Riley RM A weights approximately 485 kg more than 1994 ZAZ Slavuta.
Because 1953 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Riley RM A | 1994 ZAZ Slavuta | |
Make | Riley | ZAZ |
Model | RM A | Slavuta |
Year Released | 1953 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2330 mm |