1953 Riley RM A vs. 1999 Rover 75
To start off, 1999 Rover 75 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Rover 75 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1953 Riley RM A.
Because 1953 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 1953 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1953 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Riley RM A | 1999 Rover 75 | |
Make | Riley | Rover |
Model | RM A | 75 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2750 mm |