1953 Riley RM A vs. 2004 Toyota Yaris
To start off, 2004 Toyota Yaris is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Riley RM A weights approximately 220 kg more than 2004 Toyota Yaris.
Because 1953 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Yaris, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Riley RM A | 2004 Toyota Yaris | |
Make | Riley | Toyota |
Model | RM A | Yaris |
Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1363 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2460 mm |