1953 Riley RM A vs. 2009 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2009 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Saab 03-Sep weights approximately 339 kg more than 1953 Riley RM A.
Because 1953 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Riley RM A | 2009 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Riley | Saab |
Model | RM A | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2680 mm |