1953 Riley RM A vs. 2010 BMW 325
To start off, 2010 BMW 325 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW 325 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1953 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Riley RM A | 2010 BMW 325 | |
Make | Riley | BMW |
Model | RM A | 325 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1495 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2770 mm |