1953 Riley RM A vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Nissan Titan has automatic transmission and 1953 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1953 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Nissan Titan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Riley RM A | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Riley | Nissan |
Model | RM A | Titan |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 4060 mm |