1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 1963 Rover P5
To start off, 1963 Rover P5 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 1963 Rover P5 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Rover |
| Model | Phantom | P5 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2820 mm |
