1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Ford |
Model | Phantom | Ranger |
Year Released | 1953 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 3010 mm |