1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2006 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2006 Skoda Octavia is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2006 Skoda Octavia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Skoda Octavia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2006 Skoda Octavia | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Skoda |
| Model | Phantom | Octavia |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2580 mm |
