1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Chevrolet |
| Model | Phantom | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1836 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2760 mm |
