1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Cadillac |
| Model | Phantom | CTS |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1882 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2880 mm |
