1953 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 447 kg more than 1953 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn.
Because 1953 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Volkswagen |
Model | Silver Dawn | Polo |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4566 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 2307 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 108 L | 45 L |