1953 Rover P4 vs. 2000 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Korando is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 SsangYong Korando (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1953 Rover P4. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1953 Rover P4.
Because 2000 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Rover P4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 SsangYong Korando (257 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Rover P4. (187 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2000 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Rover P4 | 2000 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Rover | SsangYong |
Model | P4 | Korando |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2638 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 105 mm | 92.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 70 L |