1953 Simca Aronde vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Toyota Mark II is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Mark II (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1953 Simca Aronde. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1953 Simca Aronde. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 740 kg more than 1953 Simca Aronde. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Simca Aronde | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | Simca | Toyota |
| Model | Aronde | Mark II |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 2489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 70 L |
