1953 Simca Aronde vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (136 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1953 Simca Aronde. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1953 Simca Aronde. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 629 kg more than 1953 Simca Aronde. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Simca Aronde | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Simca | Volvo |
Model | Aronde | S60 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1221 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1509 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 70 L |