1953 Simca Aronde vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Simca Aronde | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Simca | Holden |
Model | Aronde | Epica |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1220 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |