1953 Steyr 2000 vs. 1999 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1999 Toyota MR2 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Steyr 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Steyr 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Steyr 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota MR2 (140 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1953 Steyr 2000. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1953 Steyr 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Steyr 2000 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1999 Toyota MR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Steyr 2000 | 1999 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Steyr | Toyota |
| Model | 2000 | MR2 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1999 |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2440 mm |
